all in all

Its funny, typically the blog is a writing relief, it is perfectly acceptable to write in casual style, there is hardly a concern conveying messages because the language and ideas are not entirely far from reach. However, the same cannot easily be said when the ideas, directions, and connotations of anagogy are brought to discussion.

While sitting down to write this, I accumulated about a page of opening statements, that now lay barely visible under the wrath of frustration and a rubber eraser. To try and begin the discussion of anagogy with any opening sentence or paragraph itself, reduces the very limitlessness of the concept.

My proverbial doors of perception to this concept, first began to unlock, unlatch, and creek open when our Dr. Sexson expanded up the commonly used yet commonly misunderstood word: Apocalypse. The lifting of the veil as it had been described.

This de-masking, can be seen in many religious texts, obviously in the Christian Bible…apocalypse, rapture… but it is seen somewhat more clearly, more true to the Greek origin of he word in the Hindu text, the Bhagavad-Gita.

In Bhagavad-Gita there is a discussion between Krishna (what serves essentially as a God) and Arjuna (I think a king if I remember correctly). Krishna, in order to convince Arjuna to go to war must show him in a sense how insignificant he is in respect to the entire order of things, to show how the world as Arjuna sees it is only micro in the eternal macro. Giving Arjuna divine eyes to look upon Krishna, Arjuna sees…all.

“All was magnificent, all expanding, unlimited.”

Arjuna says, “you are the origin without beginning middle or end.”

Krishna answers “Time I am, destroyer of worlds.”

It is here Arjuna understands, he understands in a way no one has before: limitlessly. Connecting this moment that Arjuna has of exuberance, of absolute power, knowledge, everything. Of absolute period – with the notion of anagogy, the idea that these things that he sees are attainable through literature. That complete understanding of all, can be reached once literature can be seen without a veil: complete, utterly infinitely eternal…lets just say woo-woo.

In fact when Openhimer viewed the first atomic explosion in Los Alamos, while others cried, laughed or remained silent, he too was reminded of the Bhagavad-Gita, and later cited these same passages while recounting the experience… “as if a thousand suns…”

This moment in class, discussing Frye was my woo-woo moment, my nuclear explosion.

Now this is certainly not to say I understand anagogy fully, or have truly ever seen literature or the world at this level, for I do not feel that is truly possible with human constraints. But it is the recognition and acknowledgment of this of plane existence which is significant. Blake too, sees them but, admits does not see them to their full extension.

“ the roaring of lions, the howling of wolves, the raging of the stormy sea, and the destructive sword, are portions of eternity too great for the eye of man.”

Its pretty crazy because all these things, well they border on the idea that anagogy is itself religious, that those who see, are truly enlightened. It follows almost any major religion. One is all and all is one. For quite a long time I have never considered my self a religious man, but all this while studying English, I have in a sense been pursuing the enlightenment that almost all religions strive to attain. Again I am nowhere near there, nowhere, but still its pretty woo-woo.

“I’ll reveal the truths of heaven, all the oracles

That highest wisdom holds. The things I sing

Are mighty things our forebears did not probe,

Things that have long been hidden. Let us roam

Among the starry heights; yet, let us rise

Above the earth-this site so dull, inert;

Let clouds transport us, let us stand upon

The sturdy Atlas’ shoulders; from that height

We shall watch those who stagger far below"

-pythagoras

Sancho Zimmer Pedro Martinez

constantly in class we discuss, how literature repeats itself, not only in texts but in real life. About a week ago in Don Quixote I was reading the passage where Sancho is tossed around by the group of men at the inn, one of the men being named Pedro Martinez, I couldn't help but laugh because as anyone from New England can remember. Pedro Martinez was once a pitcher for the Red Sox and in a playoff game against the Yankees he threw Yankees manger Don Zimmer (72 year old fat man) to the ground...hilarious... I tried and tried to find a youtube of this but MLB removes all of its film from online, there was however this one clip of the fight but it is unfortunatly followed by some wicked stupid acting by a yankees fan, so just check out the brief fight -picturing this to be sancho- and dont bother with the film after. 

small frye in a baked potato world

I just sat down to the arduous task of reading some Frye -its been hard with all these low mimetic comedies coming in from netflix- and i found a passage that links up exactly to a point i was trying but had a difficult time making a few posts ago. Originally i had commented on a blog by Jiwon in which there is a segment of Edward Said and i went on to say something about his view of Orientalism and what that is all about. The point i was trying to make is that while we are beginning to study our own critics-and the theories to which they contribute- it is important to recognize that we must also be absorbing all the orbiting information around our critic and around those of our peers. Or as Frye puts it, "With critics using material from psychology and anthropology, with Aristotelians, Coleridgians, Thomists, Fruedians...with students of myth, rituals, archetypes, metaphors...The student must either admit the principle of polysemous meaning, or choose one of these groups and then try to prove that ll the others are less legitimate. The former is the way of scholarship, and leads to the advancement of learning; the latter to the way of pedantry pg 72"
now while this idea might be already quite apparent to most, or has already been cited, but i feel that this passage from Frye signifies the very theme of this class: Survey of Literary Criticism.