Thursday, November 20, 2008

thought through song.


After i wrote my last blog on how we should rid ourselves of hollow distraction and resort back to the Golden Age, and a John Prine song came to mind. Here is a you tube link of this song: Spanish Pipe dream (blow up your tv).
one thing though, in this song where he says, "throw away your paper" i dont think he was going on the tangent i was earlier (important to note that i don't actually believe this but) that all literature is a waste of time, rather i think meant just the newspaper because i mean, what is news today really anyway?
Also the other line, that i at first had quarrels with was "try to find Jesus on your own" I remember first thinking "what's this guy a Jesus freak?" but then i remembered that no, John Prine is the man, and the importance is in the lines: "on your own" meaning, find spirituality independently, the way you see it...what a cool guy.

Kill Your TV


-This picture i found, is actually an illustration from probably my favorite book in high school The Monkey Wrench Gang. (For those of you who may have read it -i think thats Doc Sarvis- and damn straight for reading such a good book).

an interesting and amazing thing happened to me today: my TV stopped working. At first i felt robbed, distraught...bored. I tried tin foil, moving the bunny ears around but nothing would restore picture to the one of the four channels i receive. Having no other thing to do, and run to the end of my procrastination rope, i picked up Don Quixote and at first sort of got my feet wet, and ended up just diving in, completely submerged. I now -though i really knew all along- understood what Carly meant when she said that Don Quixote is better than anything on television. Damn was she right, i realize i waste so much time watching horribly dumb shit on TV. And i don't even watch that much TV! but i realized even a half hour, is a half hour not only wasted but half hour of toxin pumped numbly into my face. I do admit that from time to time PBS, throws some pretty good material at it. but its no saving stone.

a side note thats unfortunately depressing: It dawned on me that old Matty Arnold was correct yet possible didn't see the extent of his implications when he said,"More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete; and most of what now passes with us for religion and philosophy will be replaced by poetry. " how beautiful a world this would be if that were the case, however i don't think he could have foreseen the invention of television for if you look into almost any household, you would see that this statement is true if the TV were the substitute. If money isn't our religion of the masses than TV certainly is.

-back to what i was saying: I've really just found myself in the throws of this book, and when i needed a break i found my hands drifting towards all the unfinished Hemingway i had laying around the house.
One thing though, despite all this jubilation i felt while reading, i realized that i was missing out on something. today while i read and did other schoolwork, all of my friends hiked and skied Bridger. I realize what i was doing was important, but in a sense it was almost as false an experience as watch television. This is the same mentality that Don Quixote shares, although hes obviously well read, he is a man of action. or as he put it on page 475
"no longer does anyone ride out of this forest and into those mountains, and from there tread upon a bare and desolate beach...
...now, however, sloth triumphs over diligence, idleness over work, vice over virtue, arrogance over valor, and theory over the practice of arms which lived an shone only in the Golden Age."

This got me to thinking, if we are to believe as we've learned in class that the ages have steadily declined from Golden to Chaos despite the rise of "technology" then wouldn't it be most noble to resist all technology and resort back to our primal origins? is this blog somehow unconsciously touching upon daemons? if this is all true, are poets all liars as Plato says? and alas...will writing this defense be harder if I'm thinking like this?

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

In xanadu did Kubla Khan


In class on monday we began talking about the Cave of Montesinos, and amidst the discussion and reading the passage i could not help but being reminded of STC's Kubla Khan or: A vision in a dream: a fragment. Just the description of the cave itself held the same enchantment of the poem, rather i feel the poem held much more. Which is why it stuck out so profoundly. In class we talked of being lost in a book, the poem is in this sense more rich of a piece of work then say a novel for it is a small poem, yet its chasms range measureless to man. I think that the density of it is rooted far more deep/dank in the aesthetic than a windy novel can be, as with Joan's infatuation with pound, i feel the same here. I'm not sure if it's because of my knowledge of the origins of the poem - it came to Coleridge in an opium dream- but the poem itself reads like opium, it reads like a dark cave, a glowing meadow draped in velvet or something. as with many experiences especially pertaining to poetry its hard to describe what it makes you feel, so i suggest reading it, or hearing's on this youtube link i found where David Olney -not that big of a fan, but a good folk singer- gives a dramatic rendition.

Friday, November 7, 2008

sometimes a great notion


Given this assignment, obviously it began as a little hard to really whittle down the material into one point, one point of significance that we or I could call a touchstone. It then came to me that the most important passage i could conjure would have to be the first. The one i lost my literary virginity to...so to speak. Not in the sense it was the first piece of work that i ever read, rather it was the first i truly read and more importantly truly felt, because there is a distinct and profound difference between reading and experiencing a work.
Well the passage i chose is from Sometimes a Great Notion, for those of you who are not familiar it would be hard to appriciate but to give you some insight the story is a modern tragic about an Oregon logging family. The passage deals with the death of Joby, a hilarious character thats hard not to admire for his goodwill and general innocence/ignorance.

I want to go to my new home and put on the clean suntans
Jan's ironing for me and have the twins sit on my belly and
Squeaky show us what she drew today in drawing. And all
them things. I want...cranberries and mincemeat. Oh yeah!
And sweet potatoes with marshmallows-don't laugh- with
marshmallows baked on top and turkey...Don't laugh I want
it again! Don't you laugh it ain't funny never to taste sweet
potatoes baked with marshmallows on top again!

This point in the story is the first time I felt actually emotionally moved while reading, i must have been in six grade crying over a fictional character during silent reading. The passage is -for me- so sad/hilarious/fear and awe inspiring. The last thing you want to see is Joby die, but its so funny to think that hes about to drown, and he can't stop laughing because he keeps thinking of what a sight it would be to see his cousin Hank blowing air into his mouth, as if they were kissing, he can't get over that. Anyway the only way one could really understand what this passage meant would not be for me to paraphrase, rather to read the text itself.

However, this moment was the first, in which i experienced, rather than read literature.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

all in all

Its funny, typically the blog is a writing relief, it is perfectly acceptable to write in casual style, there is hardly a concern conveying messages because the language and ideas are not entirely far from reach. However, the same cannot easily be said when the ideas, directions, and connotations of anagogy are brought to discussion.

While sitting down to write this, I accumulated about a page of opening statements, that now lay barely visible under the wrath of frustration and a rubber eraser. To try and begin the discussion of anagogy with any opening sentence or paragraph itself, reduces the very limitlessness of the concept.

My proverbial doors of perception to this concept, first began to unlock, unlatch, and creek open when our Dr. Sexson expanded up the commonly used yet commonly misunderstood word: Apocalypse. The lifting of the veil as it had been described.

This de-masking, can be seen in many religious texts, obviously in the Christian Bible…apocalypse, rapture… but it is seen somewhat more clearly, more true to the Greek origin of he word in the Hindu text, the Bhagavad-Gita.

In Bhagavad-Gita there is a discussion between Krishna (what serves essentially as a God) and Arjuna (I think a king if I remember correctly). Krishna, in order to convince Arjuna to go to war must show him in a sense how insignificant he is in respect to the entire order of things, to show how the world as Arjuna sees it is only micro in the eternal macro. Giving Arjuna divine eyes to look upon Krishna, Arjuna sees…all.

“All was magnificent, all expanding, unlimited.”

Arjuna says, “you are the origin without beginning middle or end.”

Krishna answers “Time I am, destroyer of worlds.”

It is here Arjuna understands, he understands in a way no one has before: limitlessly. Connecting this moment that Arjuna has of exuberance, of absolute power, knowledge, everything. Of absolute period – with the notion of anagogy, the idea that these things that he sees are attainable through literature. That complete understanding of all, can be reached once literature can be seen without a veil: complete, utterly infinitely eternal…lets just say woo-woo.

In fact when Openhimer viewed the first atomic explosion in Los Alamos, while others cried, laughed or remained silent, he too was reminded of the Bhagavad-Gita, and later cited these same passages while recounting the experience… “as if a thousand suns…

This moment in class, discussing Frye was my woo-woo moment, my nuclear explosion.

Now this is certainly not to say I understand anagogy fully, or have truly ever seen literature or the world at this level, for I do not feel that is truly possible with human constraints. But it is the recognition and acknowledgment of this of plane existence which is significant. Blake too, sees them but, admits does not see them to their full extension.

the roaring of lions, the howling of wolves, the raging of the stormy sea, and the destructive sword, are portions of eternity too great for the eye of man.”

Its pretty crazy because all these things, well they border on the idea that anagogy is itself religious, that those who see, are truly enlightened. It follows almost any major religion. One is all and all is one. For quite a long time I have never considered my self a religious man, but all this while studying English, I have in a sense been pursuing the enlightenment that almost all religions strive to attain. Again I am nowhere near there, nowhere, but still its pretty woo-woo.

I’ll reveal the truths of heaven, all the oracles

That highest wisdom holds. The things I sing

Are mighty things our forebears did not probe,

Things that have long been hidden. Let us roam

Among the starry heights; yet, let us rise

Above the earth-this site so dull, inert;

Let clouds transport us, let us stand upon

The sturdy Atlas’ shoulders; from that height

We shall watch those who stagger far below"

-pythagoras

Friday, October 10, 2008

Sancho Zimmer Pedro Martinez



constantly in class we discuss, how literature repeats itself, not only in texts but in real life. About a week ago in Don Quixote I was reading the passage where Sancho is tossed around by the group of men at the inn, one of the men being named Pedro Martinez, I couldn't help but laugh because as anyone from New England can remember. Pedro Martinez was once a pitcher for the Red Sox and in a playoff game against the Yankees he threw Yankees manger Don Zimmer (72 year old fat man) to the ground...hilarious... I tried and tried to find a youtube of this but MLB removes all of its film from online, there was however this one clip of the fight but it is unfortunatly followed by some wicked stupid acting by a yankees fan, so just check out the brief fight -picturing this to be sancho- and dont bother with the film after. 

Thursday, October 2, 2008

small frye in a baked potato world

I just sat down to the arduous task of reading some Frye -its been hard with all these low mimetic comedies coming in from netflix- and i found a passage that links up exactly to a point i was trying but had a difficult time making a few posts ago. Originally i had commented on a blog by Jiwon in which there is a segment of Edward Said and i went on to say something about his view of Orientalism and what that is all about. The point i was trying to make is that while we are beginning to study our own critics-and the theories to which they contribute- it is important to recognize that we must also be absorbing all the orbiting information around our critic and around those of our peers. Or as Frye puts it, "With critics using material from psychology and anthropology, with Aristotelians, Coleridgians, Thomists, Fruedians...with students of myth, rituals, archetypes, metaphors...The student must either admit the principle of polysemous meaning, or choose one of these groups and then try to prove that ll the others are less legitimate. The former is the way of scholarship, and leads to the advancement of learning; the latter to the way of pedantry pg 72"
now while this idea might be already quite apparent to most, or has already been cited, but i feel that this passage from Frye signifies the very theme of this class: Survey of Literary Criticism.